For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, trademarketclassifieds.com who developed it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to broaden his variety, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for innovative functions should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, utahsyardsale.com is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its best performing industries on the unclear promise of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide information library consisting of public data from a large variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it should be paying for coastalplainplants.org it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain for how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.